mnl168 free 68

Shares of Eli Lilly and Company ( NYSE:LLY – Get Free Report ) were down 0.1% during mid-day trading on Thursday . The stock traded as low as $780.30 and last traded at $788.19. Approximately 2,714,656 shares traded hands during mid-day trading, a decline of 16% from the average daily volume of 3,217,376 shares. The stock had previously closed at $789.32. Analyst Ratings Changes LLY has been the topic of a number of research analyst reports. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft cut their price target on shares of Eli Lilly and Company from $1,025.00 to $1,015.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a research report on Monday, November 4th. Wolfe Research assumed coverage on Eli Lilly and Company in a research note on Friday, November 15th. They set an “outperform” rating and a $1,000.00 target price for the company. JPMorgan Chase & Co. boosted their price target on Eli Lilly and Company from $1,050.00 to $1,100.00 and gave the company an “overweight” rating in a research note on Friday, September 13th. Redburn Atlantic raised shares of Eli Lilly and Company to a “hold” rating in a research report on Monday, November 4th. Finally, Bank of America lowered their price objective on shares of Eli Lilly and Company from $1,150.00 to $1,100.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a research note on Thursday, October 31st. Four equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and seventeen have given a buy rating to the company. According to MarketBeat.com, the stock has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $1,007.94. Get Our Latest Analysis on LLY Eli Lilly and Company Stock Up 0.9 % Eli Lilly and Company ( NYSE:LLY – Get Free Report ) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, October 30th. The company reported $1.18 earnings per share for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $1.52 by ($0.34). The company had revenue of $11.44 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $12.09 billion. Eli Lilly and Company had a net margin of 20.48% and a return on equity of 71.08%. Eli Lilly and Company’s revenue was up 20.4% on a year-over-year basis. During the same quarter last year, the business posted $0.10 earnings per share. On average, research analysts expect that Eli Lilly and Company will post 13.2 EPS for the current year. Eli Lilly and Company Announces Dividend The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Tuesday, December 10th. Shareholders of record on Friday, November 15th will be given a $1.30 dividend. This represents a $5.20 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 0.65%. The ex-dividend date is Friday, November 15th. Eli Lilly and Company’s payout ratio is 56.22%. Insider Buying and Selling at Eli Lilly and Company In other news, CAO Donald A. Zakrowski sold 900 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, November 8th. The stock was sold at an average price of $803.38, for a total value of $723,042.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief accounting officer now directly owns 5,480 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $4,402,522.40. This represents a 14.11 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available at this hyperlink . Company insiders own 0.13% of the company’s stock. Institutional Inflows and Outflows Several hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently bought and sold shares of the business. International Assets Investment Management LLC boosted its holdings in shares of Eli Lilly and Company by 87,091.7% in the 3rd quarter. International Assets Investment Management LLC now owns 12,463,182 shares of the company’s stock worth $11,041,631,000 after buying an additional 12,448,888 shares during the last quarter. Pathway Financial Advisers LLC boosted its stake in Eli Lilly and Company by 92,759.9% in the third quarter. Pathway Financial Advisers LLC now owns 1,022,388 shares of the company’s stock valued at $905,774,000 after acquiring an additional 1,021,287 shares during the last quarter. Wulff Hansen & CO. grew its position in shares of Eli Lilly and Company by 90,438.0% during the 2nd quarter. Wulff Hansen & CO. now owns 937,068 shares of the company’s stock valued at $848,403,000 after acquiring an additional 936,033 shares during the period. Integrated Investment Consultants LLC increased its stake in shares of Eli Lilly and Company by 37,140.7% during the 3rd quarter. Integrated Investment Consultants LLC now owns 694,167 shares of the company’s stock worth $614,990,000 after purchasing an additional 692,303 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Comerica Bank raised its holdings in shares of Eli Lilly and Company by 71.6% in the 2nd quarter. Comerica Bank now owns 1,512,983 shares of the company’s stock worth $1,369,825,000 after purchasing an additional 631,312 shares during the period. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 82.53% of the company’s stock. About Eli Lilly and Company ( Get Free Report ) Eli Lilly and Company discovers, develops, and markets human pharmaceuticals worldwide. The company offers Basaglar, Humalog, Humalog Mix 75/25, Humalog U-100, Humalog U-200, Humalog Mix 50/50, insulin lispro, insulin lispro protamine, insulin lispro mix 75/25, Humulin, Humulin 70/30, Humulin N, Humulin R, and Humulin U-500 for diabetes; Jardiance, Mounjaro, and Trulicity for type 2 diabetes; and Zepbound for obesity. Read More Receive News & Ratings for Eli Lilly and Company Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Eli Lilly and Company and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .

Footage showing water flowing through Everton's new stadium on Thursday led to concerns from the many of the club's supporters just months ahead of the ground opening - but all wasn't what it seemed. The Toffees are building a new ground on Liverpool's waterfront and will move away from Goodison Park in the summer of 2025. With a capacity of 52,888, once open the stadium will become the eighth largest in England and will host matches at Euro 2028 . It has cost Everton an estimated £750million and taken three years to build, but there were concerns that it was facing serious problems after videos shared on social media showed water gushing down the stairwells inside one of the stands, as well as down the steps where the seats are themselves. However, Mirror Football understands that there is little reason for alarm at the footage, and Everton are relaxed about the building process, with the new stadium still on track to open for the beginning of the 2025-26 season. The club stress that the stadium is still under construction and has not yet been fitted with all of the Siphonic drainage required of a top-level football stadium. Siphonic drainage operates at full capacity and sucks water from the roof down the drain at a high velocity. Furthermore, the stadium had actually experienced a similar issue earlier this year after heavy rainfall and there was no lasting damage caused. The club expect to finish all drainage works in the coming weeks as the construction phase of the stadium completes. Liverpool , along with the rest of the western United Kingdom was battered by Storm Darragh over the course of Thursday. The fourth named storm of the season, the Met Office issued amber and yellow severe weather warnings for Northern Ireland, south-west Scotland and western parts of England and Wales. Those areas are expected to see gusts of up to 80mph (129km/h), with power cuts, building damage and transport disruption likely. Those affected by severe flooding after Storm Bert may be concerned by another storm and heavy rain. While the rainfall totals associated with Storm Darragh will not be as high, around 2-3in (50-60mm) of rain is expected in parts of Wales and central and southern Scotland by Saturday lunchtime. In an update issued earlier this week, Everton revealed a new SIS hybrid playing surface has been laid, while updates elsewhere include the installation of digital ticketing control panels, as well as further work around the concourse. The Toffees have been battling for their Premier League survival this season. Sean Dyche's side are only five points above the dropzone but did thump second-bottom Wolves on Wednesday night. Dyche was left delighted with his side's performance as they battered the Midlands team 4-0. "[There have been] a lot of question marks about what we are trying to achieve here and we had to answer them - I think the players have done," he told BBC Sport. "It was a good performance, a committed performance. I said in the week to the group that I couldn't be any more proud of these players. They have been through all sorts and they have kept going." Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Sky has slashed the price of its Sky Sports, Sky Stream, Sky TV and Netflix bundle in an unbeatable new deal that saves £240 and includes 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more.

College football Saturday: FanDuel promo code offers exclusive $150 bonus and NBA League Pass for NCAAF Week 14Zumiez: Fiscal Q3 Earnings Snapshot

The story so far: In August, U.S. Federal Judge Amit Mehta, in a tech industry-defining case, said Google had illegal monopoly power in the online search market. Following that landmark ruling, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on November 20, proposed large-scale remedies that go far beyond the Silicon Valley giant’s online search business. The proposals include possible divestment of Google’s Chrome and Android businesses. What does the U.S. DOJ proposal mean for Google? The DOJ, in its proposal, stressed that Google’s hold over the online search market had to be loosened so there can be more competition. The federal government unit has argued for a mandatory sale of the Chrome browser, possible divestment of the Android mobile operating system, a five-year-long ban on entering the browser market, and a restriction on paying third parties like Apple to make Google the default search engine on their products. Additionally, the DOJ has asked Google to provide publishers and content creators with the ability to block their data from being used to train AI models. The DOJ suggested the formation of a ‘Technical Committee’ to monitor how Google is implementing the various remedies. The proposal raised concerns about whether Google could use its AI technologies or business strategies such as acquisitions, mergers, and partnerships to bypass these remedies. Google will also have to make its search index available to rivals for a small fee and be more transparent about its search technologies. In essence, the regulator’s remedies are sweeping and intend on hitting where it hurts Google the most—its profits. The DOJ wants to make it so that “Google is prohibited from owning not only a browser—following its divestiture of Chrome it may not reenter the browser market for five years—but also from owning or acquiring any investment or interest in any search or search text ad rival, search distributor, or rival query-based AI product or ads technology.” What was Google’s response? Google strongly condemned the remedies as a “radical interventionist agenda.” “DOJ’s wildly overbroad proposal goes miles beyond the Court’s decision. It would break a range of Google products — even beyond Search — that people love and find helpful in their everyday lives,” said Kent Walker, President, Global Affairs & Chief Legal Officer, Google & Alphabet, in a blog post. The executive also listed out the potential dangers of the U.S. DOJ’s remedies. This included risking the security and privacy of millions of American users, forcing Google to disclose company and customer data to either domestic or foreign external companies, harming Google’s investments in AI, hurting Google’s business partners, impacting the ease of accessing Google Search, and normalising government micromanagement of a daily user’s internet experience. “DOJ’s approach would result in unprecedented government overreach that would harm American consumers, developers, and small businesses — and jeopardize America’s global economic and technological leadership at precisely the moment it’s needed most,” said Walker. How could the proposal affect Google’s Chrome users? When you buy a new phone, it might be natural to find Google’s search browsers or apps pre-installed and ready for you to use. The idea of intentionally finding and downloading a rival service that suits you better - such as Microsoft’s Bing, DuckDuckGo, Brave, Firefox, etc. - might not even cross your mind because Google is already present or is the easiest first choice. The DOJ’s proposals aim to break this chain for customers in America, by stopping Google from pushing its services as the go-to option for gadget users. For example, the DOJ’s filing proposed a “choice screen” even on Google devices to make sure that users can freely select either Google Search or a rival product as their default, without being nudged in Google’s direction. Needless to say, Google was not on board with this plan. “As just one example, DOJ’s proposal would literally require us to install not one but two separate choice screens before you could access Google Search on a Pixel phone you bought. And the design of those choice screens would have to be approved by the Technical Committee. And that’s just a small part of it. We wish we were making this up,” commented the company in its blog post. What are the next steps? The ball is now in U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta’s court, where the remedies will be evaluated next April. Google is also expected to propose its own remedies before Judge Mehta. Meanwhile, the DOJ will file a revised proposed final argument on March 7, 2025. It will continue to monitor Google’s activities and business operations to see if any other changes or remedies need to be added. A transition in the White House can’t be ignored as it is unclear how president-elect Donald Trump might weigh in on the legal matter. Trump had earlier threatened to shut down the search giant but backtracked later. On the other hand, Judge Mehta said the April 2025 trial would not be moved to accommodate late proposal revision requests by Trump-appointed DOJ officials. Published - November 30, 2024 02:54 pm IST Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit CCI orders investigation into Google following complaint from real money gaming platform WinZO U.S. regulator opens wide-ranging antitrust probe into Microsoft Google asks U.S. appeals court to reject app store monopoly verdict Google makes closing arguments in trial alleging its ad tech constitutes an illegal monopoly technology (general) / internet / Artificial Intelligence / litigation and regulation / antitrust issue / The Hindu ExplainsBetMGM Debuts 2024 Emirates NBA Cup Original Bets Sweepstakes, November 21-29

Austin, November 30: Elon Musk's X has several fake accounts that resemble the actual account of a person or entity. These X parody accounts often have the same picture as the one they are mimicking, or they react to the post or repost with other quotes on the X platform. These accounts often use the word "Parody" to avoid confusion with the real person, which others mention in their bio. X parody accounts often confuse users on the platform when trying to identify whether they belong to a real person or not. These accounts mimic the lives of real-life people, such as politicians, film actors, artists, sports professionals, and others. Now, X may introduce a new feature on the platform that would show "Parody Account." Grok App Launching Soon: Elon Musk Confirms Introducing Mobile Application for His xAI’s Chatbot. According to a report by TechCrunch, Elon Musk's X is developing a new "label" for parody or fan commentary accounts. Using this capability or feature, the platform could distinctly show that the account is a "Parody Account" and not real. This could likely show on the profile page and in the posts they post on the X platform. Due to this, the report said that the chances of someone mixing or altering the original post or words from the real account would be less. Despite this development, the report said that Elon Musk's X would find it difficult to force accounts to apply labels to their profiles. X parody labels, if rolled out, would necessitate the platform changing its policies around satirical accounts. X currently has a dedicated policy called the "Authenticity Policy" to handle parody or satirical accounts on the platform. The policy asks these accounts to comply with X's rules and avoid impersonating other profiles to spread misinformation. The policy addresses Parody accounts, Commentary accounts, and Fan accounts. Users can operate accounts only if they discuss, satirise, and share information. Motorola Launches Moto AI Beta; Check Eligible Devices and Know How To Access. X parody labels could also help eliminate several accounts operated by automated bots. The report said that if the parody does not accept the labels, it might create confusion among users. (The above story first appeared on LatestLY on Nov 30, 2024 02:57 PM IST. For more news and updates on politics, world, sports, entertainment and lifestyle, log on to our website latestly.com ).UMASS 62, HARVARD 54