ph365 facebook

ph365 facebook Brock Jarvis wants Nikita Tszyu in a pay per view blockbuster in Sydney next year, after capping off a remarkable comeback with a brutal fourth round knockout win over Adrian Rodriguez. Meanwhile, No Limit’s card of 2025 was marred by what is being called the biggest robbery in Australian boxing in years, with rising star Jasmine Parr dropping a split decision to Shannon O’Connell. This masthead can confirm No Limit wants Jarvis and Tszyu headlining its first pay-per-view card of 2025, with plans for the fight to take place in March. BOXING: INOUE VS GOODMAN | TUE 24 DEC 7PM AEDT | Australia’s Sam Goodman is set for a blockbuster Christmas Eve fight against undefeated Naoya ‘The Monster’ Inoue in Tokyo | Order Now with Main Event on Kayo Sports. Tszyu has been sidelined since his fight of the year contender win over Koen Mazoudier in August, but is back in the gym after recovering from hand surgery. Tszyu has said he’d knock Jarvis out if they ever fought, with Jarvis hitting back on Friday night. “I’ve heard his original call out, he said he would knock me out,” Jarvis told this masthead at ringside. “I want him next, whenever, wherever.” Brock Jarvis (R) gets through the defence of Adrian Rodriguez. Pictures: No Limit Boxing/Gregg Porteous Tszyu and Jarvis have sparred together years ago, with Nikita telling this masthead: “We sparred a couple of times in the amateurs. “It was just when he was starting off as well. “I remember kicking his ass. So, let’s go again. “We’ll see how much he’s improved. With small 10 ounce gloves (in the pros) and over 10 rounds...Poor Brocky.” Jarvis clapped back at those comments as he celebrated his win over Rodriguez. “I was a kid when I sparred him, I was still playing footy,” he said. “I went to footy training to sparring to spar him. “I didn’t even know anything about boxing then. I’d just started.” In the co-main event, Parr suffered what has been labelled one of the worst robberies in Australian boxing, dropping a bizarre split decision to O’Connell with scores of 80-72, 78-74 and 75-77. Jasmine Parr dropped a split decision to Shannon O’Connell. Pictures: No Limit Boxing/Gregg Porteous An emotional Parr was fuming moments after the first loss of her professional career. “Look at her face and look at my face, she was running the whole fight,” Parr said. “It’s unexplainable, that’s boxing I guess. “I know for a fact I won that. “It’s dodgy shit. I’m lost for words, because that’s highway robbery.” Parr was consoled by Sam Goodman as she exited the ring. “Sam said I won,” she said. “Sam watched it at ringside and said she maybe won three rounds. “She’s older, she was running, she wasn’t going to last, and she didn’t. She had her hands down and was running. “Fight me like a real woman.” One of the brightest prospects in Australian female boxing, Parr called for an immediate rematch with the 41-year-old O’Connell. “I’d better get one,” she said. “She’s 41 years old, who knows how long she’s got left in the sport. “People have always said there’s politics in boxing, and here it is. This is my first taste of it.” Meanwhile, Australia has a new boxing star, with Paris Olympian Callum Peters scoring a stunning first round knockout on his professional debut against Mitch Holden. And the light heavyweight prospect did it in a pair of indoor football shoes. Callum Peters (R) won his fight wearing football shoes. Pictures: No Limit Boxing/Gregg Porteous “They’re Jordans. This one’s 11 from a Brazilian player from a few years ago,” Peters said. “I always use futsal shoes, they’re cheaper, they’re better, they’re lighter and they keep the feet going. “Lomachenko and Usyk did the same thing. “I used to have this massive green boxing boots, and they took ages to do up. They looked like wrestling shoes, up to your knees. “I couldn’t wore those anymore, so I switched, I wore them at the Commonwealth Games and they’re still going good.” Peters is signed to No Limit, with Matt Rose saying he wants him to remain as active as possible in 2025. “He could fight 10 times a year,” Rose told this masthead. “Just like Mike Tyson back in the day.” More Coverage Brutal choice Huni had to make to take the next step Brendan Bradford Aussie boxing’s next blockbuster will be bigger than Green-Mundine Brendan Bradford and Peter Badel Originally published as Brock Jarvis’ Nikita Tszyu reveal as PPV blockbuster looms, but ‘robbery’ ruins co-main Boxing/MMA Don't miss out on the headlines from Boxing/MMA. Followed categories will be added to My News. Join the conversation Add your comment to this story To join the conversation, please log in. Don't have an account? Register Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout More related stories Boxing/MMA ‘Prison b***’: Tables turn on Tszyu brothers Tim Tszyu is facing an ugly truth and bitter rival Michael Zerafa is the one that’s exposed it after drama unfolded on Friday night. Read more Boxing/MMA World title fight rocked by horrific injury The toll of Aussie boxer Kaye Scott’s world title fight loss to Desley Robinson in Sydney was clear for all to see after the slugfest. Read moreChess grandmaster Magnus Carlsen returns to a tournament after a dispute over jeans is resolved

Seadrill (OTCMKTS:SDRLF) Trading Up 6.9% – Time to Buy?

Letter from Westminster by Danny Chambers

Tim Dankha And Prolific Mortgage: Redefining Excellence In The Mortgage Industry

Why one MP thinks Preston could merge with Pendle as part of radical council overhaulLiverpool head coach Arne Slot has demanded more from his team after they battled to a 1-0 victory in the Champions League and said he was "far from happy" with the performance. Liverpool looked some way from their best at the Estadi Montilivi, but secured the win thanks to a Mohamed Salah penalty in the second half after Donny van de Beek was deemed to have fouled Luis Díaz inside the area. Editor's Picks Player ratings: Salah scores but Alisson's saves keep Liverpool perfect in Champions League 4h Adam Brown Champions League as it happened: Madrid win thriller against Atalanta, Villa snatches winner 3h ESPN The victory means Liverpool continue their perfect record in Europe, having won all six of their Champions League games this term, but Slot insisted performances must improve if his team have ambitions of going all the way in the competition. Speaking to TNT Sports after the game, the Liverpool boss said: "If you ask me about all the six games I am really pleased with all the results and the performances in the five games. "I am far from pleased about the performance tonight. Especially two things. If you play against a team that has such a good idea about football, knows how to bring the ball out like teams we have played recently in Real Madrid and Manchester City , you need to be so intense. "But if you are waiting to press and are so easily outplayed, this team can cause you problems. This is what they showed throughout Champions League except [against] PSV. "I feel sorry for them because they deserve more than three points. We have an incredible goalkeeper. When we lost the ball we were not aggressive enough. Hardly any control at all of the game. Maybe the second half was a bit better." One major positive for Liverpool was the return of Alisson to the starting lineup, with the goalkeeper having been sidelined since Oct. 5 with a hamstring injury. The Brazilian made a string of saves to preserve Liverpool's fifth clean sheet in Europe this season, and Slot was quick to dub him "the best goalkeeper in the world" after the match. "He definitely didn't look like he'd been away," Slot said. "I said as a bit of a joke the players wanted to test his fitness today [giving up chances]. "He showed today what I said so many times that he's our first goalkeeper. That's nothing to do with Caoimhin [Kelleher], who did well, but [Alisson] showed today he's one of the best, in my opinion, the best goalkeeper in the world. Let's hope he can keep these performances going and stay fit." Slot also defended striker Darwin Núñez , who spurned a number of chances against Girona and has just three goals in 19 appearances for Liverpool this term. Asked whether the Uruguayan is low on confidence, Slot said: "What I can agree on is that he missed a few chances; then it is a question if he's low on confidence. "I think every striker has a moment when everything goes in and then a period where try so hard and don't score. But the good thing is we have many players who can score. He was a threat but unfortunately he couldn't score." Regardless of the results the rest of the day, Liverpool is guaranteed to finish the sixth of eight league phase rounds in first place on 18 points. The final two rounds will be played at the start of 2025. ESPN's Sam Marsden contributed to this story.

The Saints are making contingency plans to play without QB Derek Carr as they try to stay alive

Well done to the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) for the excellent resurfacing of many roads in the Suan Luang area by using tarmac to eliminate all the recently installed red pedestrian crossings, white road markings and lane dividers. The ensuing havoc of cars and bikes driving all over the flipping place and pedestrians having no crossing facilities on On Nut 17 (and other sois) as a result of those essential markings being obliterated is marvellous. Congratulations! Bob Kneale Coups always wrong Re: "Anutin says no to coup bill", (BP, Dec 10). What an extremely sad and sorry state of affairs when Anutin Charnvirakul -- a leader of a major political party and Minister of the Interior thinks so little of the parliamentary system and the citizens that he is quite happy to allow the possible intrusion of the military into political affairs. There is never a good enough reason for the military to organise an armed coup and depose an elected government, and any bill that reduces that risk is worth voting for. Does Mr Anutin really think so poorly of his past political friends and party members that they deserved to be ousted by men in uniform, and more importantly, did the generals improve the situation and improve the democratic system that he purportedly stands for? But then, as a man who once apologised for a statement that he insisted he did not post, he may not be the best example for aspiring politicians to follow. Steve Merchant Notre Dame truth? Re: "Notre Dame reborn", (PostBag, Dec 10). The Eternal Optimist rather contradicts his own nom de plume with the suggestion that there was foul play involved in the destruction of much of Notre Dame cathedral five years ago. As far as I'm aware, the exact cause of the fire is not known, but I haven't previously seen any suggestion it was other than an accident. In any event, TSO can't have it both ways. Either there was a "vile fire" or "Eight-hundred-year-old oak does not burn". Both cannot be true in this instance. Ray Ban Flyover conundrum Re: "Drunk Benz driver kills motorcyclist", (BP, Dec 5). According to the news, the man with 119 mg/dl of alcohol in his blood drove his Mercedes car and hit the motorcycle on the Thai-Japanese flyover in Bangkok. The motorcycle rider fell to her death on the road below. The car driver is certainly responsible for driving under the influence, according to the law. But I'm curious about the flyover being off-limits to motorcycles. Isn't it? The female rider might not have faced tragedy if she had been disciplined and always abided by traffic law while driving. James DebenturesGoogle and the US government faced off in a federal court on Monday, as each side delivered closing arguments in a case revolving around the technology giant's alleged unfair domination of online advertising. The trial in a Virginia federal court is Google's second US antitrust case now under way as the US government tries to rein in the power of big tech. In a separate trial, a Washington judge ruled that Google's search business is an illegal monopoly, and the US Justice Department is asking that Google sell its Chrome browser business to resolve the case. The latest case, also brought by the Justice Department, focuses on ad technology for the open web -- the complex system determining which online ads people see when they surf the internet. The vast majority of websites use a trio of Google ad software products that together, leave no way for publishers to escape Google's advertising technology, the plaintiffs allege. Publishers -- including News Corp and Gannett publishing -- complain that they are locked into Google's advertising technology in order to run ads on their websites. "Google is once, twice, three times a monopolist," DOJ lawyer Aaron Teitelbaum told the court in closing arguments. Presiding judge Leonie Brinkema has said that she would deliver her opinion swiftly, as early as next month. Whatever Brinkema's judgment, the outcome will almost certainly be appealed, prolonging a process that could go all the way to the US Supreme Court. The government alleges that Google controls the auction-style system that advertisers use to purchase advertising space online. The US lawyers argue that this approach allows Google to charge higher prices to advertisers while sending less revenue to publishers such as news websites, many of which are struggling to stay in business. The US argues that Google used its financial power to acquire potential rivals and corner the ad tech market, leaving advertisers and publishers with no choice but to use its technology. The government wants Google to divest parts of its ad tech business. Google dismissed the allegations as an attempt by the government to pick "winners and losers" in a diverse market. The company argues that the display ads at issue are just a small share of today's ad tech business. Google says the plaintiffs' definition of the market ignores ads that are also placed in search results, apps and social media platforms and where, taken as a whole, Google does not dominate. "The law simply does not support what the plaintiffs are arguing in this case," said Google's lawyer Karen Dunn. She warned that if Google were to lose the case, the winners would be rival tech giants such as Microsoft, Meta or Amazon, whose market share in online advertising is ascendant as Google's share is falling. The DOJ countered that it simply "does not matter" that Google is competing in the broader market for online ads. "That is a different question" than the market for ads on websites that is the target of the case, said Teitelbaum. Google also points to US legal precedent, saying arguments similar to the government's have been refuted in previous antitrust cases. Dunn also warned that forcing Google to work with rivals in its ad products would amount to government central planning that the court should reject. If the judge finds Google to be at fault, a new phase of the trial would decide how the company should comply with that conclusion. And all that could be moot if the incoming Trump administration decides to drop the case. The president-elect has been a critic of Google's, but he warned earlier this month that breaking it up could be "a very dangerous thing." arp/dw

West Ham show support for hospitalized Antonio before Premier League match

Barry Odom begins Purdue career with larger NIL budget and questions about payment dispute at UNLV